With a constantly-increasing list of financial firms in the Houston area, it’s no wonder that many consumers struggle to pick the right one. Between Financial Advisors, Financial Planners, Investment Advisors, Broker-Dealers, and dually-registered firms, there are a plethora of choices for wealth management professionals that each has its own fees, investment philosophies, pros, and cons.
According to Kitces, “broker-dealers [are] a fundamentally sales-oriented transactional business, as the job of broker-dealers, and the stockbrokers they employ, is literally to facilitate the purchase and sale of investments (for themselves or their customers), for which they are paid a commission or mark-up for effecting the transaction. Accordingly, broker-dealers are [historically] subjected to a “suitability” standard – that in the process of selling securities to and on behalf of their customers, they only make recommendations that are not unsuitable for that customer.”
In my opinion, brokers-dealers like the muddy waters created by the new Reg BI rulings. They don’t want you to know that you’re meeting with someone in a product-sales role who can get paid in non-transparent ways including commissions, kickbacks from mutual funds, or other means. Brokers have a massive lobbying group that dwarfs others in the industry, which may likely be why regulation is working out for them.
Registered Investment Advisors, like those at Willis Johnson and Associates, are held to the highest fiduciary standards in the industry. A fiduciary standard is one involving trust, or, is one to be held or given in trust. An RIA is defined as “any person who, for compensation, engages in the business of advising others”.
Additionally, under Section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, RIAs have a stringent requirement not to engage in “any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client.” The case of SEC vs Capital Gains Research Bureau proved the need for RIAs to perform fully-fledged fiduciary duties for their clients given the relationship of “trust and confidence” that exists between a client and his/her advisor.
In short, we hold the trust and confidence of our clients and prospective clients to the highest standards and only work in their best interest.
As an RIA, we get paid the same way no matter what our clients invest in. We make an effort to be extremely transparent, which is why we put a fee calculator on our website and walk our clients through their investments and our strategies multiple times a year.
To summarize: brokers are set up to sell (or buy) securities. Registered Investment Advisors were initially set up to give fiduciary advice to the consumer.
Brokers = sales
Registered Investment Advisors = advice
There are also dually-registered individuals or hybrids that are registered as both Broker and Investment Advisors. To me, this is even more concerning for consumers! These professionals can put down one hat and pick up the other hat at any point in time acting as either a Broker or Investment Advisor from minute to minute to serve their own financial gain.
The SEC, the organization in charge of regulating the financial services industry, recently implemented a controversial set of rules and interpretations regarding the financial advice given by brokers. This new set of rules is referred to as Regulation Best Interest, or Reg BI, and was intended to make it simpler for consumers to know if the person advising them is working in their best interest; however, many fiduciary firms (those with a legal obligation to work in the best interest of their clients rather than for their own best interest for commissions) believe the new rules muddied the water and have allowed more leeway for broker-dealers looking to work in their own interest.
Since the release of this new rule, XYPN, run by well-known Financial Advisor blogger Michael Kitces, seven states, and the District of Columbia have each filed lawsuits against the SEC over these new Reg BI rules. The rules are complicated and nuanced, but you can read a summary published on Barron’s by the Investment & Wealth Institute here.
While these rules are required to be followed in order to comply with the SEC, the flexibility in them allows for different ideological interpretations among different types of advisors.
The problem with Reg BI is that it allows Brokers to more easily provide advice to consumers without being held to the same standard of care as Registered Investment Advisors, causing more confusion for the consumer.
Through the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act of 2010, Congress stated that fiduciary advisors must “provide personalized investment advice about securities to a retail customer… the standard of conduct for such broker or dealer, with respect to such customer, shall be the same as the standard of conduct applicable to an investment adviser”— meaning that, if brokers are able to provide ‘advice,’ then they must also be Fiduciaries.
In reality, the SEC (through Reg BI) has now allowed brokers to provide one-time advice that is “solely incidental” and is “in connection with and reasonably related to” the sale of products. The area of ‘advice’ is clearly laid out by Congress to be under the domain of Registered Investment Advisors. According to the Dodd-Frank Act, if Brokers provide advice, then they should be held to the same standard as RIAs—but they aren’t!
Another thing to note, and Kitces points out succinctly, is that “…the SEC effectively positions RIAs in Regulation Best Interest as [those who provide] ongoing advice and investment management services, implying that more ‘transactional’ advice is the domain of broker-dealers. In fact, in the original version of Regulation Best Interest, the SEC repeatedly referred to broker-dealers as the deliverers of “episodic” advice.”
For client-facing roles working for Registered Investment Advisors the most common title is “Financial Advisor.” Guess what the most commonly used title for Brokers is? You guessed it—it’s also “Financial Advisor.”
How is the consumer to know whether they are working with someone in a sales-oriented role or an advisory role? They don’t. The SEC allows the title of “Financial Advisor” for dual-registrants as long as they disclose that they may act in multiple different capacities, either as an advice-giver in the client’s best interest, or as a salesman. I can tell you from personal experience that very few people read the disclosures given to them and, almost no one who does read them understands them.
Due to poor regulation, it’s difficult for consumers to know if they are working with a fiduciary or not; however, at the end of the day, most people in the financial services industry (including the majority of Brokers) are in it to help those they serve.
At Willis Johnson and Associates, we take pride in acting in our client’s best interests — not just because of our fiduciary obligation, but because we think it’s the right thing to do. We believe in educating our clients on the questions they need to be asking, the answers to those questions, and giving them a road map to a successful financial future.